The End of Affirmative Action and its Effect on the US Workforce

The end of affirmative action and its effect on the US Workforce

Share This Post

What is Affirmative Action?

Affirmative Action is a set of policies and practices aimed at promoting equal opportunities for historically marginalized groups, such as women, racial and ethnic minorities, and individuals with disabilities. It seeks to address systemic inequalities and discrimination that have historically hindered these groups from achieving fair representation and access to educational and employment opportunities.

The primary goal of Affirmative Action is to level the playing field and create a more diverse and inclusive society by actively promoting diversity in various sectors, including education, employment, and contracting. The policies typically involve taking proactive steps to increase the representation of underrepresented groups through targeted recruitment, outreach programs, and preferential treatment in the selection process.

What is the history of affirmative action?

The history of affirmative action in the United States can be traced back to the 1960s, during the height of the civil rights movement. It emerged as a response to longstanding racial and gender inequalities that persisted despite legal advances in civil rights.

In 1961, President John F. Kennedy issued an executive order that required government contractors to take affirmative action to ensure equal employment opportunities for individuals regardless of their race, color, religion, or national origin. This marked the first formal use of the term “affirmative action” in a policy context.

However, it wasn’t until 1964 with the passing of the Civil Rights Act that affirmative action gained legal backing. Title VII of the act prohibited employment discrimination on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. It authorized the creation of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) to enforce these provisions.

In subsequent years, affirmative action was expanded to encompass a broader range of policies and initiatives. The Johnson administration, through Executive Order 11246, required federal contractors to take affirmative action to ensure equal employment opportunities and prevent discrimination.

Affirmative action continued to evolve over time. In 1978, the Supreme Court case Regents of the University of California v. Bakke examined the use of affirmative action in college admissions. The court ruled that strict racial quotas were unconstitutional but allowed universities to consider race as one factor among many in their admissions processes.

Since then, there have been ongoing debates and legal challenges surrounding the implementation and constitutionality of affirmative action policies. Several cases, such as Grutter v. Bollinger in 2003 and Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin in 2016, have further shaped the legal framework for affirmative action in higher education.

Why is Affirmative Action important?

The importance of Affirmative Action lies in its potential to break down discriminatory practices, increase diversity, and foster inclusion. It helps to challenge biases and prejudices, promote a more comprehensive understanding of merit, and expand access to resources and opportunities. Additionally, by creating diverse environments, Affirmative Action can enhance creativity, innovation, and problem-solving by bringing together individuals with different perspectives and experiences.

While there is debate surrounding the effectiveness and fairness of specific implementation methods, the underlying principle of Affirmative Action remains rooted in the pursuit of social justice and equal opportunities for all members of society.

Affirmative Action in College Admissions

Recently, the Supreme Court made a significant ruling regarding affirmative action in college admissions. The court effectively overturned affirmative action by declaring that race cannot be used as a factor in college admissions decisions. This ruling has implications for institutions across the United States.

The decision was reached with a divided Supreme Court, and it marks a shift in the approach to affirmative action in higher education. The court’s ruling prohibits the consideration of race-conscious admissions, effectively ending the use of affirmative action policies that take race into account during the college admissions process.

This ruling has been interpreted as a major setback for proponents of affirmative action, who argue that such policies are necessary to address historical inequities and promote diversity on campuses. Critics of affirmative action, on the other hand, view the ruling as an important step toward a more color-blind society.

It is important to note that this ruling specifically pertains to affirmative action in college admissions and does not necessarily impact affirmative action policies in other domains such as employment or government contracting.

Affirmative Action's Impact on Workplace Diversity

According to various sources, the end of affirmative action in college admissions could potentially have an impact on workplace diversity and the composition of the workforce. Affirmative action policies were implemented to promote equal opportunities for underrepresented groups, and their removal may pose challenges in achieving and maintaining diversity.

An article from Time highlights how the end of affirmative action can make it more difficult to establish a diverse professional workforce, which is crucial for the country’s progress. Additionally, Vox points out that the Supreme Court’s decision to end affirmative action in college admissions may embolden challenges to diversity, equity, and inclusion efforts in hiring practices.

The Guardian raises concerns about the future of diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) in employment following the Supreme Court’s decision to strike down diversity policies in higher education. It suggests that this decision could have broader implications for workplace DEI initiatives.

Despite the potential risks, Barron’s notes that many companies continue to prioritize workplace diversity even after the end of affirmative action. However, one possible consequence could be a decline in college graduates from underrepresented backgrounds, affecting the pipeline of diverse talent entering the workforce.

Forbes highlights that the impact of the end of affirmative action extends beyond college admissions. It could potentially reroute the talent pipeline and influence hiring practices across industries.

In terms of historical precedent, according to an article by SHRM, states that banned affirmative action experienced a decline in racial diversity in the workplace in the years that followed.

While the exact effects of ending affirmative action on the workforce may vary and depend on various factors, these sources suggest that it has the potential to impact workplace diversity and the ability to create an inclusive workforce.

Subscribe & Follow

2024

Salary Guide

Whether you need to adjust your company’s pay range or are considering extending an offer, our comprehensive guide enables you to make data-driven decisions with confidence!

More To Explore

Job Search Tools You Should Be Using in 2025

Job Search Tools You Should Be Using in 2025

Navigating the modern job market can be daunting, but with the right tools in your arsenal, finding your next career …

Read More →

How to Stand Out in the 2025 Job Market

The 2025 job market is set to be highly competitive and ever-evolving, driven by rapid advancements in technology, shifts in …

Read More →
Future-focused employee benefits with flexible workspaces, mental health support, and career development opportunities in 2025.

The Future of Employee Benefits: What Job Seekers Value Most in 2025

As we approach 2025, the landscape of employee benefits is transforming to align with evolving workforce expectations. For employers, staying …

Read More →
Scroll to Top
city personnel logo

Login

Skip to content